One document, three numbers
Three amounts behind a single document Rocketpot asks for
The identity document Rocketpot asks for is tied to three different numbers, each in a clause of its own, and one of them applies only under an extra condition. This piece sets the three side by side.
The document Rocketpot asks for is one document. But three different numbers, in three different clauses, each with its own condition, appear attached to it in the house's terms — and none of the three explains, in the text, how it fits with the other two.
This piece sets out all three, each with its clause, without trying to decide which one counts for more.
| House | Points | Withdrawal ceiling | Amount that triggers the document | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 VaveTest with the desk's own money | 3/5 | No limit per week or month (cl. 8.8) | no amount | Visit the casino |
1 Bitcasino.io | 4/5 | Large amounts: up to 1 million USDT a week (cl. 6.10) | 2,500 EUR, or the same value in crypto cl. 6.6 | |
2 Rocketpot | 4/5 | After a large win, 5,000 USD a month (cl. 11.5) | 2,500 USD in one clause, 2,000 USD in the other cl. 11.4, 12.4 | |
3 Wild Fortune | 4/5 | Day 1,000 EUR · week 5,000 EUR · month 15,000 EUR cl. 11.8 | no amount | |
4 Metaspins | 3/5 | No ceiling; may pay in parts (cl. 12.5) | no amount | |
5 Rainbet | 3/5 | No ceiling; minimum request 15 USD (cl. 8.1) | no amount | |
7 Bitsler | 2/5 | Floor and ceiling set by the house (cl. 8.6) | no amount |
The first number: 0.05 BTC or 2,500 dollars
Clause 11.4 prints two equivalent amounts: 0.05 BTC or 2,500 dollars. It is the first point at which a concrete figure appears attached to the identity check in the house's terms. The clause does not say which of the two — the bitcoin figure or the dollar figure — is the main reference; the two stand side by side, as alternatives.
The second number: 2,000 dollars
A few clauses on, 12.4 prints a third equivalent amount: 2,000 dollars. It is a smaller number than the 2,500 dollars quoted in clause 11.4, yet it deals, on the face of it, with the same kind of situation — a withdrawal request that sets off the check. In the passage read, the terms do not explain why clause 12.4 uses a different floor from the one clause 11.4 had already fixed a few paragraphs earlier.
The third number: a ceiling of 5,000 a month, with a condition
Clause 11.5 adds a third amount to the set: a ceiling of 5,000 dollars a month in instalments — but that ceiling applies only after a win of 5,000 or more. It is not an ordinary withdrawal ceiling: it is a conditional one, which comes into play only if the player first wins an amount inside that band. A withdrawal of an equivalent size, with no originating win, does not necessarily reach the same clause.
Three numbers, three conditions, one document — and Rocketpot's text does not reconcile the three into a single amount or a stated order of precedence.
What the register showed about the licence number
Away from the subject of verification, the licence number 1668/JAZ is printed in clause 1.2 of the terms. In a search made on the 12th and 13th of that same September, the cert.cga.cw portal showed precisely that number marked “not valid” — outside the active state, in the window in which the check was made. Terms and register, at that moment, did not agree about the state of the number.
That point is handled more fully on the page about licence validity, which gathers other cases where register and terms do not reconcile.
The document Rocketpot asks for, in three numbers
This piece does not decide which of the three amounts — 0.05 BTC / 2,500 dollars, 2,000 dollars, or the conditional ceiling of 5,000 a month — is the one that holds in practice. All three are written down, each in its own clause, and that is what is recorded here. For the full set of verification amounts used by the other houses on the same list, see the page on identity verification; for each house's withdrawal ceilings, see withdrawal ceiling.